Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
podcast
Filter by Categories
ArcGIS Pro
GDAL
GeoJson
Map
Map Tools
Maps
postgis
Python
QGIS
Uncategorized

Understanding Satellite Orbits: LEO, MEO, and GEO Explained

Understanding Satellite Orbits: LEO, MEO, and GEO Explained

Step 1: What is Low Earth Orbit (LEO)?

LEO, or Low Earth Orbit, is located at an altitude of approximately 500 to 2,000 kilometers from the Earth’s surface. This orbit is heavily populated with thousands of satellites, including the International Space Station.

Illustration of LEO satellites

Characteristics of LEO

  • Size and Cost: LEO satellites are generally smaller and less expensive to launch.
  • Low Latency: Their proximity to Earth allows for low latency communication, making them ideal for real-time applications.
  • Maintenance Needs: Due to atmospheric effects, these satellites require regular maintenance to stay on track.

Step 2: Exploring Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)

MEO, or Medium Earth Orbit, operates between 2,000 and 36,000 kilometers above the Earth. This orbit is where satellites encounter the Van Allen radiation belt, necessitating additional shielding.

Diagram of MEO satellites

Applications of MEO

  • Navigation Systems: MEO is primarily used for navigation systems like GPS, which are vital for various industries including aviation and maritime.
  • Low Latency Connections: MEO is favored for low latency connections in remote areas, where terrestrial connections are not available.
  • Coverage Efficiency: You can achieve the same coverage with fewer satellites in MEO compared to LEO.

Step 3: Understanding Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO)

GEO, or Geostationary Earth Orbit, is located at an altitude of 35,786 kilometers. Satellites in this orbit appear to remain stationary relative to the Earth, making it a popular choice for telecommunications.

Representation of GEO satellites

Key Features of GEO

  • Planet-Wide Coverage: GEO satellites can cover a vast area, often requiring only three satellites to provide global coverage.
  • Competitive Market: The limited number of available slots for GEO satellites makes this a competitive and expensive market.
  • Geosynchronous vs. Geostationary: While all geostationary satellites are geosynchronous, not all geosynchronous satellites are geostationary. The latter remains fixed over the equator.

Step 4: Comparing LEO, MEO, and GEO

Each type of orbit has its strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different applications:

  • LEO: Best for low latency and real-time applications, but requires many satellites for coverage.
  • MEO: Offers a balance between coverage and the number of satellites needed, ideal for navigation and remote connections.
  • GEO: Provides extensive coverage with fewer satellites, making it a backbone for satellite communications.

Conclusion

The exploration of LEO, MEO, and GEO orbits reveals their critical roles in satellite technology. Understanding these orbits helps in choosing the right satellite solutions for various applications, from telecommunications to navigation and beyond. As satellite technology continues to evolve, the possibilities for future applications are limitless.

About the Author
I'm Daniel O'Donohue, the voice and creator behind The MapScaping Podcast ( A podcast for the geospatial community ). With a professional background as a geospatial specialist, I've spent years harnessing the power of spatial to unravel the complexities of our world, one layer at a time.